Why Mentors, Peers and Support Got Worse After I Started Doing Inner Work
You started doing inner work, among other reasons, to improve your capacity for genuine connection and support. And something unexpected happened: the mentors and peer relationships that were working before the work started to feel less adequate. The support structures that were sufficient became insufficient. The communities that provided some sense of belonging became less satisfying.
The investment in development produced, at least temporarily, a worse experience of the support structures that were already in place.
This is real, it’s common, and it’s not evidence that the inner work is going wrong.
The Calibration Shift
Inner work recalibrates what you’re looking for from mentors, peers, and support. Before the work, the calibration was set by whatever your baseline expectations were — expectations formed by whatever support was available and what you had learned to accept as normal or adequate.
As inner work develops your capacity for genuine connection, your sense of what genuine connection feels like, and your awareness of the gap between genuine support and its performance — the things that previously seemed adequate start to register as genuinely insufficient.
The calibration shift in support expectations is the mechanism: your sense of what support can and should be has expanded, and the current structures haven’t expanded with it.
The Peer Mismatch Problem
Inner work typically produces development that doesn’t happen at the same rate in your existing peer group. You’re doing deliberate development work; they may not be. The result is a growing mismatch between where you are and where they are — not in terms of accomplishment or value, but in terms of the quality of inner life and the depth of conversation that produces genuine peer support.
The growing mismatch with the existing peer group produces the experience of existing peer relationships becoming less sustaining, not because the peers have changed but because you have.
The Mentor Recalibration Problem
Inner work also recalibrates what you need from mentors. The mentor whose guidance was useful before the work may have been effective at the strategic and tactical level. As inner work makes it clear that the primary blockers are often at the identity and inner landscape level, a mentor calibrated only to the outer strategy level starts to feel insufficient — the guidance lands on a different layer than the layer where the work is most needed.
The mentor’s utility being recalibrated by inner work produces the experience of the previously-right mentor becoming less adequate — not because they’re less skilled, but because what you need has changed.
The Between-State
All of this produces a specific between-state: the old support structures are insufficient but haven’t been replaced by something more adequate. The inner work has produced development that the support environment doesn’t yet match.
The between-state of support disruption is genuine and worth acknowledging — not rushing past, not treating as a permanent condition, but recognizing as the developmental moment that requires the specific work of finding support at your actual current level.
You are not behind. The person whose support got worse after starting inner work isn’t experiencing the work failing — they’re experiencing the natural disruption of development that temporarily outpaces its support.
If you want to find a support community calibrated to people actively doing inner work rather than those who haven’t yet started, the Abundance GPS Skool community offers a free trial. Join here.
Leave a Reply