Why I Keep Avoiding the Truth About Trauma and Nervous System: The Business Cost

The first article on avoidance addressed the protective function — what the avoidance is keeping safe. This article looks at the other side: the accumulated cost of the avoidance in professional terms, specifically in the business record. Take your time with this.

The Business Record as Avoidance Mirror

The business record of a practitioner whose nervous system patterns are operating unchecked tells a specific story. Not the story the practitioner tells publicly — the actual numbers.

The revenue that was charged versus the rate the expertise warranted. If the practitioner’s market rate has been suppressed by the worth trigger for three years, the revenue gap across those three years is a concrete cost of the avoidance. Not a hypothetical — an actual amount that was earned by peers at the warranted rate and not by this practitioner.

The scope that was given versus the scope that was agreed. Every unplanned extension, every absorbed extra, every added session at no additional charge represents real given value that was not compensated. Across months and years, this accumulates to a concrete amount.

The visibility that was suppressed. The audience that was not built, the content that was not published, the authority that was not claimed — these represent a reach and an impact that did not materialize because the visibility trigger held the publication or the platform-building below the level the expertise warranted.

Why Looking at the Cost Matters

Looking directly at the cost of avoidance — not as self-punishment but as accurate assessment — is the most reliable motivation for the behavioral evidence work.

The practitioner who has a precise understanding of what the worth trigger has cost in concrete revenue terms has a more compelling reason to face the triggering situations than the practitioner who only understands the pattern abstractly.

The cost assessment is not a shame exercise. It is a clarity exercise: This is what the pattern has produced. This is what facing it and doing the behavioral work would produce instead.

The Forward-Looking Calculation

The forward-looking version of the same calculation: if the behavioral evidence practice is maintained consistently over the next twelve to eighteen months, and the primary triggering patterns shift by even thirty percent — what is the revenue impact? What is the scope impact? What is the visibility impact?

This calculation is the concrete return on the investment of the behavioral work. It does not require certainty about the outcome — it requires an honest estimate of what partial pattern resolution would produce in the actual business.

The cost of avoidance and the return on the behavioral work are both real numbers. Looking at both is the direct look that the avoidance has been preventing.

If you want community for this work — the Abundance GPS community on Skool offers a free trial. Come as you are.