Why I Keep Avoiding the Truth About Forgiveness and Release

If there is a specific truth about the forgiveness work that you are aware of and keep not looking at directly — a piece of the material that you approach and then move away from — the avoidance is a structural response, not a character failure. Take your time with this.

What Avoidance Is Doing

Avoidance of the specific truth in forgiveness work is the nervous system’s protective response to material that it predicts will be overwhelming or harmful to approach directly. The protection is automatic — it does not require a conscious decision. The practitioner who keeps circling around a specific piece of the forgiveness material without approaching it directly is not choosing to avoid it. Their nervous system is generating the avoidance before the choice is made.

Understanding this does not make the avoidance disappear. It does make it possible to work with it more skillfully — to recognize it as protection rather than as reluctance or cowardice, and to approach the material with the pacing that the nervous system’s protection is asking for.

What the Avoided Truth Usually Contains

The piece of forgiveness material that is most consistently avoided is usually one of the following:

The full scope of the harm: The practitioner who has worked with a sanitized version of what happened — who has processed the manageable parts while keeping the most significant part at a distance — may be avoiding the truth of how significant the harm actually was. The full acknowledgment of the scope is avoided because the nervous system predicts it will be overwhelming.

The self-directed unforgiveness: The practitioner who has directed their forgiveness work toward the other person while not directly addressing the unforgiveness they hold toward themselves — for having been in the position of being harmed, for having stayed too long, for having trusted when they knew something was wrong — is avoiding the self-directed layer.

The specific behavioral cost: The truth that the unforgiven material is directly costing specific professional and personal outcomes — that the counter-intentions have been producing concrete avoidance and restriction that the practitioner is not prepared to acknowledge in full. Naming the full behavioral cost makes the cost real and makes the choice to address it also real.

Who the harm came from: Sometimes the avoided truth is specifically about the source of the harm — a person or institution toward whom the practitioner has a complex relationship that makes full acknowledgment feel threatening to other valued aspects of the relationship or identity.

Approaching Gradually

The avoidance is protection. The appropriate response is graduated approach, not forced direct contact.

Graduated approach: get as close to the avoided material as the nervous system currently allows, without pushing past the protection into overwhelm. Stay at that proximity with full somatic attention. Notice what happens. Then return to the distance that feels sustainable.

Over time, the proximity that the nervous system allows increases. The material that was unapproachable becomes approachable from a short distance, then a closer distance, then directly. The graduated approach is not slower than forcing direct contact — it is more reliable, because it works with the nervous system’s protective mechanism rather than against it.

The practitioner who has been trying to approach the avoided material through force and finding it doesn’t work is not failing. They are trying to bypass a protection that exists for a reason. The graduated approach respects the protection while still moving toward the material.

What Approaches When the Truth Is Met

When the avoided truth is met directly — after the graduated approach has brought the practitioner close enough to engage with it — the experience is rarely what the avoidance predicted. The nervous system predicted overwhelm. The actual experience of meeting the avoided material is typically more like grief or relief — the grief of fully acknowledging what happened, and the relief of no longer maintaining the energy cost of the avoidance.

The material does not destroy the practitioner who approaches it. The prediction of destruction was the protection’s overestimate of the risk. The truth of the forgiveness work, met gradually and with support, is something the practitioner can metabolize — which is what the work is for.

If you want community for this work — the Abundance GPS community on Skool offers a free trial. Come as you are.