The Practitioner Who Crossed the Revenue Ceiling
This is a composite story drawn from common patterns in practitioners who work with the abundance trigger. Details are illustrative, not specific. Take your time with this.
He’d made $147,000 in year three. In year four, he made $152,000. In year five, $149,000.
He had a chart on his desk — a revenue tracker he’d maintained since month one of the business. When he looked at it from a few feet back, he could see it: a band. The revenue moved within a narrow range, regardless of what he did. Strong quarters were followed by weak ones. Strong years were followed by costs that brought the net back to the band.
He told himself it was the market. He told himself it was growth cycles. He told himself it was the cost of running a sustainable business.
The chart didn’t agree. The expenses that arose in the strong quarters were not strategic investments; they were reactive. A laptop that broke down in the month he most could have set aside the repair fund. A client loss in the quarter after the strongest revenue period in his business history. A period of reduced business activity — he’d called it “rest” — that had followed the $12,000 launch month.
He’d named it when he started the trigger work: the abundance trigger. The nervous system’s predictive response to financial expansion beyond the familiar range. He’d grown up in a household where windfall income was followed by loss — his father’s employment had been seasonal and irregular, and abundance was always followed by scarcity. His nervous system had learned, with great precision, that expansion predicted collapse, and had developed a set of behaviors designed to prevent the collapse by preventing the expansion.
The behaviors were invisible from inside. Each felt rational. The reactive expense felt like a reasonable decision. The client loss — he’d taken on a client he’d had doubts about, during the strong period, and the client had terminated early — felt like a judgment error, not a trigger output. The rest period felt like genuine self-care.
The pre-commitment, when he made it, was unusual: he would not make any unplanned financial decisions in the 30 days following a revenue event above $10,000. Anything above that threshold — any expense, investment, or financial commitment — would be deferred for 30 days and reviewed from a regulated state before acting.
The first test came three weeks into the practice. A strong month — $14,000 — and then, immediately, an offer from a business coach whose content he respected: a group program, $4,500, enrollment closing in 48 hours. The impulse was immediate: this is the right investment, this is what the extra revenue is for, the timing is perfect.
He wrote it in the journal: “Above the $10K threshold. Deferring 30 days.”
The enrollment closed before the 30 days were up. He didn’t enroll.
He sat with the discomfort of that for two weeks. The trigger told him he’d missed an opportunity. He looked at his financials at the end of the month. The $14,000 was still there.
Three months in, he’d had four above-threshold months. In each, he’d applied the 30-day hold. Two of the deferred investments he’d ultimately made — on schedule, from a regulated state, and with clarity that the investment was genuinely what he wanted rather than an impulse produced by the trigger. Two he’d let pass; the urgency that had driven them in the moment was absent thirty days later.
The revenue from those four months was still in the business. For the first time in five years, the chart was moving above the band rather than back toward it.
By month twelve, the chart looked different. The revenue ceiling was not gone — he’d had one month that activated the trigger so strongly he’d made two reactive expenses in the same week, and the net had come back down. But it was different in degree and in frequency. The band had shifted upward. The $147,000 baseline was moving toward $180,000.
He looked at the chart. He thought about what his father’s house had felt like in the good months — the particular vigilance, the way prosperity was never quite trusted.
His nervous system had learned that story so well it had been writing it into his business for five years.
He was writing a different one now. Slowly. With evidence. Month by month.
If you want community for this work — the Abundance GPS community on Skool offers a free trial. Come as you are.
Leave a Reply