The Expert Who Spoke at Every Event and Was Still Unknown

By the metrics of professional visibility, Tomas was doing everything right. He spoke at conferences in his field. He published a regular newsletter. He had several thousand followers on LinkedIn. He appeared on podcasts. When you searched his name, credible things came up.

And yet no one seemed to know what he was actually about.

The Pattern

Tomas had what could be called the activity-without-presence pattern. He was everywhere in a diffuse sense — present at many surfaces, distinctive at none of them.

His newsletter covered a wide range of business and mindset topics. His conference talks were competent but not particularly memorable — solid frameworks, delivered cleanly, nothing that caused people to seek him out afterward. His LinkedIn posts shared other people’s insights with brief commentary. His podcast appearances were engaging conversations in which he mostly responded to the host’s questions rather than advancing his own point of view.

He was productive. He was consistent. And he had almost no reputation as someone with a specific, identifiable point of view.

What Was Underneath

The visibility pattern in Tomas’s case was not about staying small. He was genuinely trying to be visible. The pattern was about staying safe within visibility — being present without being specific enough to be disagreed with.

Developing a clear, differentiated point of view would mean making specific claims about his field that could be wrong, challenged, or found insufficient by people whose regard he valued. Speaking from a differentiated position would mean that some people would not resonate with it — would actively disagree with it.

The diffusion was protection from that exposure. By covering many topics at a moderate depth, he was never wrong enough about any specific thing to invite serious challenge.

The problem was that the same diffusion that protected him from challenge also prevented the kind of distinctiveness that builds a reputation. People couldn’t refer him easily because they couldn’t describe what he was specifically about. They couldn’t recommend him for a specific opportunity because he wasn’t clearly positioned for anything in particular.

The Moment of Recognition

The recognition came from an unlikely source: a client who had been working with him for six months and who, in a session, tried to describe what Tomas was about to a colleague who was interested in working with someone.

Tomas listened as his client struggled. “He’s really good at strategy,” the client said, finally. “And he thinks a lot about the intersection of mindset and business.” The colleague asked what specifically Tomas focused on. The client looked at Tomas, uncertain.

Tomas had no clean answer. He realized, in that moment, that he had been circling his own work for years without landing on it.

The Work

The practice was not to develop better marketing language. It was to answer one question with increasing precision over four months: what is the specific thing I see about how businesses fail that most people in my field don’t see?

The question produced discomfort. Several answers appeared and were then dismissed as too simple, too obvious, too bold, too likely to be wrong. Tomas tracked these dismissals as part of the pattern — each “too” was the protection mechanism operating.

He committed to the answer that felt most true and most exposed: most business problems that look like strategy problems are actually identity problems wearing strategy clothes. Leaders solve the wrong problem because they can’t afford to solve the right one.

He published a piece building this argument specifically and by name. No hedging, no “of course every situation is different,” no deference to other frameworks.

The response was the most significant engagement he had received in years. Several people disagreed sharply. More people recognized the specific thing they had been experiencing and reached out directly.

His reputation began, slowly, to coalesce around a specific thing.

What Changed

Tomas continued speaking at events, writing his newsletter, appearing on podcasts. The activity level didn’t change substantially. The content changed: more specific, more willing to be wrong, more distinctively his.

The number of people who followed him didn’t grow dramatically. But the quality of the relationships changed — people who found him now found him because they specifically resonated with his point of view, and those relationships converted to clients at a much higher rate than the diffuse network had.

The protection had been costly. Not in obvious ways — he had maintained reasonable professional activity throughout. But in the cumulative cost of years of visibility that hadn’t produced the traction it should have.

The Invitation

The Abundance GPS community provides the structured support for developing specific, differentiated presence — including the practice of being distinctively visible and the community witness that makes it possible.

Seven-day free trial.