If you’re sitting down to price your first group container, you’ve already done more thinking than most people give you credit for — you’ve built something worth gathering people inside, and now you’re trying to put a number on it without betraying either the work or yourself.
That’s a harder question than it looks. And no, the answer isn’t “what does the market charge.” The market doesn’t know what you’re holding. Let’s walk through this slowly.
Start with what the container actually is, not what you’ll charge for it
Before a price exists, the thing being priced has to be clear — to you first, then to anyone you’d invite.
Write down, in plain language:
- How long the container runs (six weeks, three months, six months).
- How many live touchpoints there are (calls, q&a sessions, hot seats).
- What happens between the calls (a private space, voice notes, prompts, nothing).
- What people walk in with, and what they walk out with — described as a felt shift, not just a deliverable.
- How many people you’ll let in.
If you can’t write this down in one page, the price isn’t your problem yet. The shape is. A pricing freeze almost always traces back to a container that hasn’t been fully decided. You can’t confidently value something that’s still half-formed in your own mind.
Anchor the price to transformation and capacity, not to your hourly rate
Here’s where a lot of first-time group pricing goes sideways: you take your 1:1 hourly number, divide it across the group, and arrive at something that feels suspiciously cheap. Then you discount it further, because “it’s the first round.”
That math punishes you twice. Group containers aren’t cheaper-per-hour 1:1 work. They’re a different offer. They include the room itself — the peers, the field, the witnessing, the way one person’s question unlocks something for someone three seats away. None of that is in the hourly model.
Try this instead. Ask three questions:
- What is one honest outcome someone could reasonably experience inside this container? Not the dream-case. The honest one.
- What would that outcome be worth to them — in money, time, relief, or doors opened?
- What does it cost you to hold this well? Energy, prep, recovery, the boundary you’ll have to keep with your week.
The price lives somewhere between “fair share of the value created” and “honours the cost of holding it.” If you’re moving from 1:1 work, the move from hourly billing to package-based pricing is worth thinking through before you build the group, because the same identity work applies.
Pick a first-cohort number you can say out loud without flinching
Now the real test. Whatever number you’re considering, try saying it out loud. Alone, in the car, to nobody.
If your voice gets small, that’s information. If your voice stays steady, that’s information too.
For a first cohort, three honest options:
- The aligned-low number. A price that feels generous but not self-erasing. You can say it without shrinking. It probably reflects the fact that this is round one and you’re still learning the shape.
- The honest-middle number. A price that makes you take a breath before saying it, but you can still say it. This is usually closer to right than people think.
- The reach number. A price you’d love to charge in round three when you have testimonials, refined materials, and a track record. Not this round.
Most first-time group containers land between the aligned-low and the honest-middle. The reach number is for later — and that’s not a failure of nerve, it’s just sequencing. There’s a separate question of when you’re ready to raise your rates, and it deserves its own conversation, not a panicked decision in this one.
Decide your pilot logic, and write it down
Because this is your first time, you have an honest reason to price the first cohort slightly below where it will eventually live. Not as a discount. As a pilot.
A pilot is different from a discount in one important way: it has a stated reason and a stated endpoint.
Write a short note to yourself — not to share publicly unless you want to — that says something like:
“This first cohort is priced at X because I’m running it for the first time. I’m learning how it lands, what to keep, what to cut. The next round will be priced at Y. People in this cohort understand they’re getting the founding price in exchange for their feedback and their willingness to be in version one.”
That paragraph protects you from two things at once: pricing too low out of guilt, and pricing too high without acknowledging that round one is round one. It also keeps you from discounting before anyone has even asked, which is a different pattern with a different root.
Sanity-check the math against your own week
Before the price is final, multiply it out.
If your container holds eight people at your chosen price, what does the cohort earn in total? Now subtract the platform fees, the time you’ll spend prepping, the hours of live delivery, the integration time afterward, and any support you’re paying for.
What’s left? Divide it by the number of hours the whole thing will actually take you — not just the visible calls, but everything around them.
If that number is lower than what you’d charge for a single 1:1 hour, the price is probably too low, or the container is too big, or both. Adjust before you launch, not after.
One last thing about the number itself
You will not get this perfectly right the first time. Nobody does. The price you choose this round is a draft, not a verdict on your worth.
What matters more than landing on the “correct” number is that the number you pick is one you can hold steady on when someone asks. A price you can say without apologising is worth more than a higher price you’ll quietly walk back the moment a hesitation appears in the conversation.
If you’d like to think this through with other conscious entrepreneurs who are pricing their own first containers — and getting honest feedback before they launch instead of after — that’s a lot of what happens inside our Skool community. You’re welcome to come sit in the room with us.
Leave a Reply