If you’re asking how I think about the difference between being called to heal and being called to teach, you’ve already done something a lot of people on this path skip — you’ve stopped assuming the two callings are the same thing, and you’ve started wondering whether the way you’ve been working might be quietly miscast. That noticing matters. It usually shows up after years of doing both at once, getting good results, and still feeling some private friction you can’t quite name.
So let me try to answer it the way I’d answer it on a podcast — with one story, and a few distinctions that have been useful to me.
The story that made the distinction land for me
A few years ago I was working with a woman — I’ll call her Priya. [Illustrative example.] She’d been a somatic practitioner for almost a decade. Her one-to-one work was extraordinary. People walked into her room carrying things they’d been carrying for thirty years, and walked out lighter. She knew it. Her clients knew it. Her income, though, was flat. She was tired in a way sleep didn’t fix.
When she came to me, she was convinced she needed to “scale.” That meant, in her mind, building a course. Teaching what she did. Recording modules. Writing a curriculum. She’d bought the programs about how to do it. She had a folder of unfinished drafts.
About forty minutes into our first conversation, I asked her a quiet question: “When you imagine teaching this, what happens in your body?”
She went still. Then she said, “It feels like sandpaper.”
That was the moment. Priya was called to heal. She was not called to teach. The course wasn’t the next level of her gift — it was a translation of her gift into a language her nervous system didn’t speak. The reason her business felt stuck wasn’t strategy. It was that she was trying to grow in a direction her calling didn’t actually point.
The distinction I use now
Healing and teaching are both sacred. Both are needed. But they pull on different parts of a person, and they reward different things.
Here’s the shorthand I’ve landed on:
- A healer’s medicine is presence. The thing that changes the room is them — their attention, their nervous system, the field they hold. The transmission happens in proximity. Take the person out of the room and most of the medicine goes with them.
- A teacher’s medicine is structure. The thing that changes the room is the map they’ve built. The transmission happens through the framework. Take the person out of the room and the medicine still works, because the structure carries it.
That doesn’t mean a healer can’t teach, or a teacher can’t heal. Most of us do both at some point. But there’s usually a centre of gravity. One of the two is your native language. The other is a second language you can speak — sometimes well — but it costs you more energy and it doesn’t replenish you the same way.
The question isn’t “which is better.” Neither is better. The question is: which one returns energy to me when I do it, and which one drains it, even when I do it well?
Why this gets confused in conscious-entrepreneur work
For people who carry adverse childhood experiences, this distinction gets especially blurry, and it’s worth naming why.
If you grew up reading the room — tracking other people’s nervous systems to stay safe — you probably developed an extraordinary capacity for presence. That capacity makes you a natural healer. People feel held around you without you having to try. The cost of that, of course, is that holding space can quietly drain you in ways nobody warned you about.
And here’s where it gets tangled: the industry around conscious work tends to reward teaching. Courses scale. Frameworks sell. Group programs look like growth. So a lot of natural healers end up trying to become teachers — not because the calling shifted, but because the business model said they should.
The reverse is true too. There are natural teachers who keep doing one-to-one healing work long past the point where it serves them, because the field tells them real spiritual work happens in the sacred container of the one-to-one. So they stay small, and the framework they were meant to build never gets written.
Both of these are versions of the same problem: trying to grow in a direction that isn’t actually yours.
How I help people tell which one is theirs
I don’t think you figure this out by journaling about it. The body knows faster than the mind does. So I usually ask three questions, and I ask them slowly.
The first is: What does your body do when you imagine holding a single person in deep work for ninety minutes? Notice whether it softens or braces.
The second is: What does your body do when you imagine standing in front of a room — or on a screen — and walking a group through a model you built? Notice the same thing.
The third one is the one most people skip: Which of those two, when it’s done well, leaves you more resourced afterwards? Not which one you’re better at. Not which one your audience prefers. Which one returns energy.
If you sit with those, the answer is usually already in you. You just haven’t been allowed to hear it, because the business advice you’ve been absorbing wasn’t built with this distinction in mind. It was built to push everyone toward the same growth shape, regardless of which calling they actually carry.
What changed for Priya
Priya didn’t build the course. She raised her one-to-one rate, cut her client load roughly in half, and built a small retreat once a quarter where she could do the deep work in a held container. Her income roughly doubled within a year. Her tiredness lifted. The course folder is still on her hard drive. She might write it one day. She might not. Either way, she stopped treating it as the proof that her work was serious.
That, to me, is what releasing the brake looks like — not pushing harder in the direction the industry pointed, but turning toward the direction your own calling was already pulling you. The block wasn’t sitting in her strategy. It was sitting in a quiet mismatch between who she was and what she’d been told growth was supposed to look like.
If this is the question you’re sitting with
You don’t have to decide today. Most people I work with discover that the answer was already obvious to some part of them — they just needed a frame that made it safe to listen. If that’s where you are, and you’d like to sit with this alongside other conscious entrepreneurs asking the same question of themselves, you’re welcome inside our Skool community, where we work through this kind of distinction in conversation rather than in isolation.
Leave a Reply